Mosaic is now liveMCP tools, 760+ targets across oncology, neuro and cardio, preprint on Zenodo.See plans →
Mosaic
All theses

Target thesis · GTPase

KRAS

GTPase KRas

Generated 2026-07-12 · KG version 84 · every number traces to the evidence appendix

Coverage note

read this firstCoverage confidence: High

High coverage — assessed with confidence across dimensions.

DimensionHoldingTier
Literature366 curated papers (PubMed ~30,278 oncology) — the most-covered target in the KGHigh
Patents416 patentsHigh
Compounds94 distinct compoundsHigh
Genetic validationpresent (DepMap, 1,208 models)High
Structuralpresent (Foldseek/AlphaFold + AlphaMissense)High

Coverage honesties, up front

  • Modality coverage is unreliable here: 97.9% of compounds are unclassified (only 2 covalent compounds typed), so the KG cannot evidence a non-covalent or pan-RAS small-molecule franchise.
  • The ChEMBL universe call failed, so the compound tier is stated by absolute holdings rather than against the full chemical universe.

Assessed with confidence

  • Genetic validation
  • Competitive intensity
  • Resistance network
  • Effector module (RALGDS/RGL1/NF1, PPI-proxy)

Flagged / withheld

  • Modality coverage (97.9% unclassified)
  • ChEMBL universe call failed

Target-level readiness: Thesis-ready.

Headline verdict

Moderate non-consensus angle· directional, well-sourced

A validated oncogene addiction in the middle of a patent gold-rush. DepMap shows genuine selective dependency (essential in 52% of models), but a 2022→2025 filing surge (24 → 112 → 106) has crowded the direct-inhibitor space. The direct-inhibitor wave has begun to reach the clinic (first phase-1/2/3 entrants now visible), though 86 of 94 compounds remain preclinical. The graph's one robustly-evidenced non-consensus read is on-target resistance (KRASG12C — 41 papers across 33 independent sources), pointing to a combination-first posture. The downstream “bypass network” is real but thinner than it looks — most nodes co-derive from shared reviews — and the RAS-effector module (RALGDS/RGL1/NF1) is suggestive but PPI-proxy only — and these genes sit outside Mosaic's curated coverage, so it is a lead to verify externally, not an assessed whitespace.

The bull case

  1. 1.

    Selective genetic addiction — the real thing. DepMap mean gene effect -0.7249, essential in 52.4% of 1,208 models (dependency fraction 0.524). This is a true selective dependency, materially deeper than EGFR's 17.6%.

    confidence: highgenetic_validation

  2. 2.

    Strongly pathogenic, hotspot-driven mutational landscape. AlphaMissense flags 74.5% of 3,591 scored variants pathogenic, with a hotspot at residue 57 (0.9998).

    confidence: highgenetic_validation.variant_pathogenicity

  3. 3.

    Deep, recent commercial conviction. 416 patents; filing velocity surged 9 (2021) → 24 (2022) → 112 (2023) and held at 106 in 2025. Named leaders (Amgen 21, Mirati 15, Astellas 14) signal a real race, not speculative noise.

    confidence: highcompetitive_landscape

  4. 4.

    Literature depth. 366 curated papers — the densest target in the KG, supporting a well-evidenced view.

    confidence: highcoverage.dimensions.literature

The bear case

  1. 1.

    Still overwhelmingly pre-clinical. Of 94 compounds, 86 are preclinical (phase 0); the clinic now shows 4 phase-1, 1 phase-2, a phase-3 and 2 phase-4 — early clinical entrants have appeared, but the franchise is unproven at scale.

    confidence: highcompetitive_landscape.compound_phase_distribution

  2. 2.

    The gold-rush has crowded it. 416 patents / 349 organizations with a 2023 spike of 112 filings — direct G12C/pan-KRAS chemical space is contested.

    confidence: highcompetitive_landscape

  3. 3.

    Resistance is already documented — dominated by on-target escape. The strongest signal is KRASG12C itself, 41 papers across 33 independent sources; downstream bypass nodes (SOS1, RAF1, MAP2K1) are already drugged elsewhere (96–156 compounds) but, per source-doc dedup, largely co-derive from shared reviews rather than independent evidence. Durable monotherapy is unlikely.

    confidence: highresistance_bypass_map + dedup

  4. 4.

    Modality narrowness. The only typed chemical matter is 2 covalent compounds; the KG cannot evidence a non-covalent or pan-RAS small-molecule franchise.

    confidence: moderatekg_native.modality_gaps (flagged; classifier covers ~2%)

The non-consensus angleModerate non-consensus angle

On-target resistance is the real, independently-corroborated signal. Of the curated resistance hits, only KRASG12C clears the bar: 41 resistance-context papers across 33 distinct source documents (acquired + general). The implication is a combination-first posture — durable monotherapy is unlikely. This is well-sourced but not co-essentiality-grade, so it is framed as directional.

  • On-target resistance is the real, independently-corroborated signal: KRASG12C, 41 resistance-context papers across 33 distinct source documents. The implication is a combination-first posture — durable monotherapy is unlikely.

    confidence: headline-eligible — 33 independent sourceskg_native.resistance_bypass_map (curated)

  • The downstream “bypass network” is thinner than node-counts suggest (dedup caveat). The raw map lists 18 curated nodes, but they trace to 46 source docs with heavy sharing — one review alone supplies 5 nodes (FGFR3, MAP2K1, RAF1, RET, KRASG12C). FGFR3, RAF1, MAP2K1, WEE1, BRD4 and others are co-derived from shared reviews with no node-unique evidence. Only SOS1 (2 papers, 1 node-unique; already drugged) has standalone downstream support.

    confidence: source-doc dedupsynthesis_input...network_dedup

  • RAS-effector module — suggestive, not validated. After excluding 5 calmodulin PPI artifacts, the functional-coupling whitespace tool leads with RALGDS, RGL1, NF1, RASSF1, SOS2 — a coherent RAL-effector / RAS-GAP module distinct from the crowded RAF/MEK axis. None is in Mosaic's curated target set, so the graph holds no patent/compound data on them; their competitive status is not assessed (not a whitespace claim). And this is PPI-proxy only — no DepMap co-essentiality fired — so it is a weaker observation worth checking externally, not a co-essentiality-grade finding.

    confidence: PPI-proxy — low-moderatekg_native.synthetic_lethal_whitespace (PPI-proxy)

    Patent / compound status: not assessed (out of coverage). gene outside Mosaic curated coverage — competitive landscape is a validated lead to verify externally, not a whitespace claim.

Honest empties

  • emerging_signals shows no abnormal recent surge (KRAS is saturated, not heating).
  • Modality is 97.9% unclassified (uninformative).

What would change this thesis

  • If a phase-2/3 readout shows a direct KRAS inhibitor holds durable monotherapy response, Bear #3 (resistance-bound) weakens and the combination-first thesis softens.
  • External verification of RALGDS / RGL1 / NF1 competitive status — these genes are outside Mosaic's curated coverage, so the graph cannot confirm the effector module is open; verify externally before treating it as whitespace.
  • If DepMap co-essentiality data resolves a true synthetic-lethal partner for KRAS (none fired here), the non-consensus angle upgrades from PPI-proxy to validated.
  • Bear #1 has already begun to soften: the phase distribution has matured since the prior snapshot — a phase-3 and a phase-2 entrant now sit above the preclinical wave (86 of 94 still phase 0). A positive phase-3 readout would weaken it further.